What is Painting?

"The answer to the question “What is Painting?” is simple and clear. The answer is “Who cares?” - Morgan Meis, an arts collective in New York.

The Smart Set from Drexel University is an online publication covering culture and ideas, arts and sciences, global and national affairs. A recent article by Morgan Meis entitled “A Dilettante's Guide to Art” reviews the book “1001 Paintings You Should See Before You Die” by Stephen Farthing and poses the question "What is Painting?" The answer: "Who cares?"

Meis writes: Sometime in the middle of the 19th century painting started to get a little screwed up. It began to worry. Painters stopped simply doing what they were doing and started spending more and more time trying to figure out what they were doing and why. They got into the "What Is?" question. "What is Painting?", "What is Art?" "What Is…?"

It’s hard to blame them for it. The "What Is?" question was in the air. Chalk it up to the vast and traumatic transformations that ushered in modern times. Everybody was trying to figure out what was different and what was still the same. In painting, the biggest change was in the abandonment of representation as the central task. Nobody was interested in problems of perspective anymore, in figuring out how best to make the world of three dimensions look vaguely like itself on the canvas of two dimensions. And yet, for some reason, people still felt the desire to paint. Who knows why? Maybe it was just the need to hold on to a little tradition even as so much else was being swept away. Maybe it was the hope that an old practice could remake itself in a new world. Whatever the explanation, painting managed to remake itself and painters rushed into the 20th century with purpose. They had discovered a new subject matter, painting itself, and they were hot to show off its possibilities. Painting took on a double task, not just to do what it was doing, but also to make a claim about what it should be doing. Painters started talking about painting within their own paintings.

Malevich’s famous White on White comes to mind. It was, basically, one white square painted on top of another white square. It is a lovely painting in its own right, but it is also a manifesto in pigment. When Malevich painted those white squares he was also asking what painting could be, what it was about, what it should and shouldn’t be. Malevich was obsessed with the idea that art had to be freed from its relationship to the object. He thought that art should go after something more pure, perhaps touching on the realm of purity itself, wherever that is. His paintings thus asked the “What Is?” question and proposed to answer it simultaneously. His answer was that painting ought to be about truth and that truth is a simple and geometrical thing.

The amazing thing about 1001 Paintings is thus the breeziness of it all. It is a dilettante’s book …… the dilettantes are always right, because paintings are for looking at, and because every claim about what painting “should be” gets shriveled and old and academic even before the canvas does. The dilettante doesn’t care much about what painting “should be,” only about what it is and has been. And the thing that keeps this standpoint from being utterly trivial is the hint of melancholy in it. The dilettante is interested in all things equally because in the long eye of time all things are equally transient. Looking can become delightful again from that perspective, but it is tinged with the mark of death. The dilettante acknowledges this mark, and then goes about the business of living.

The answer that the book thus gives to the question “What is Painting?” is simple and clear. The answer is “Who cares?”

What painting(s) do you care about? Give the name and I will supply the link.

Posted August 29, 2007

8 comments:

Peter said...

Well the Mona Lisa has never intrigued me which probably makes me an art Philisine! But some works have made me pause and think about what was going on in the scene.

Take a look at Degas’ L’Absinthe. Doesn’t the woman’s expression make you wonder what she thinks of the old geezer sitting beside her?

Take care,
Peter

Ps – Hope you can make a link to it for me as promised!

Janet Witherspoon said...

Peter, I like it. Intriguing! You might wonder about Orphan Girl in a Cemetery (link please moderator!).

What is she thinking? Or is she frightened about something. Its by Delacroix (had to look that up I must admit).

Janet

Roger Spenser said...

I enjoyed the article “A Dilettante’s Guide to Art”. Very well written and I agree with much of it.

I see that previous bloggers have posted their favourite art works so let me join in with three of my own.

In line with Peter and Janet’s comments on facial expressions here is one by Frans Hals entitled The Gypsy Girl. She has a better expression than the Mona Lisa! Impish I’d say!

Next is The Death of Marat by Jacques-Louis David. This guy doesn’t look dead to me ;-) Anybody else agree?

Finally, I like old staid John Constable and in particular The Valley Farm. Don’t know why but I just feel a sense of peace looking at his stuff.

Some of my links are not great so, Michael, if you can find better ones please replace mine.

Thanks
R

Pianoman said...

As a musician I tend to think of chords in terms of their ‘color’ or ‘shading’. A slight change in one note of a chord of only a half step can make all the difference between a great composition and an average one. I think it is with this understanding that I tend to like paintings by Monet. The way he hints at things with just a little dab of color is the way we hint at things musically.

Look at the nuances in color with The Red Boats.

This one is like a Jazz composition.

See what I mean?

Pianoman

Philip Kurian said...

Since this is mostly a philosophical blog surely you are all represented somewhere in Raphael’s School of Athens?

I’m the guy on the right ;-)

Phil

Janet Witherspoon said...

Phil, I’m the one in the green dress on the floor!

Janet

Philip Kurian said...

I don’t think much of contemporary painting but this I quite like.

Kudos to first person to name the artist!!

Phil

Derek Bell said...

Phil, Jackson Pollack.

Michael, I got the book for the next thread – it’s a great read!

D. Bell